My recent article in European Voice argues that the costs to the West of war with Iran would pale compared to the costs to the developing world. The piece poses starts by posing that debates on the pros and cons of attacking Iran turn, inevitably, to 1973 and to its consequences for the West. That year, the Arab oil embargo mainly hit industrialized economies and led to deep recessions. But 2012, I argue, is not 1973. Today, the fallout of conflict with a major oil producer would not stop at Western pumps. It would almost exclusively punish countries with a high energy intensity – the developing world, not economically advanced nations. Read the article.
Twitter
- Brand new piece: From the State to the Market and Back. Policy Implications of Changing Energy Paradigms
http://t.co/mt8CNhQN - Out: special issue Policy Agendas for the Future of Global Energy feat. Fatih Birol, Diana Urge-Vorsatz&Shonali P…
http://t.co/qFd6mM84 - Energy jobs at Exeter:
http://t.co/XW6JOMXS - That's really interesting - never a bad idea to benchmark: Database: Faculty Salaries at More Than 1,200 Colleges
http://t.co/5GFOlI54 - Borrell forced to resign over energy interests | European Voice via @EuropeanVoiceEV
http://t.co/iRwmGvVL
- Brand new piece: From the State to the Market and Back. Policy Implications of Changing Energy Paradigms
Tags
-
Recent Posts
- New book addresses key dynamics of energy governance in Europe and Russia
- Unaddressed “side effects” of the shale gas revolution bear risks for European energy security
- The costs to the West of war with Iran would pale compared to the costs to the developing world
- New policy report discusses challenges and opportunities for transatlantic energy cooperation
- A public policy perspective on global energy security offers new routes of research
Archives
Recent Comments
- Niko L on Review of OPEC book in Handelsblatt
Meta